- Productivity Stacks Newsletter
- Posts
- #284: Why "Busy" Is Quietly Burning You Out (And How to Fix It)
#284: Why "Busy" Is Quietly Burning You Out (And How to Fix It)
The Mantra Every High-Performing Founder Uses On Hard Days
Productivity Stacks Newsletter
Issue No. 284
The Best in Evidence-Based Productivity
for Small Business Owners, Freelancers & Founders
Helping You Work Smarter and Live More
The Rundown
The simple mental habit every high-performer shares
Content strategy in 2026: What actually changed (and what didn't)
Why Busy Is The New Burnout And How To Improve Productivity At Work
This to-do app actually keeps up with my brain
Google turns Chrome into an AI co-worker for the workplace
👉Did you miss an issue? Check out previous Productivity Stacks issues anytime here
Recommendations
Note: This section is sponsored by Shortform. They have no input on which books I recommend or why.
The book I'm now recommending to clients who procrastinate
If you've been calling yourself a procrastinator, I want to push back on that.
I just finished reading The Now Habit by Neil Fiore (and its Shortform Guide) in our Doers Inner Circle Book Club and I'm officially adding it to the list of books I recommend to clients who are stuck. Here's why.
PS. if you’re not already on Shortform, you should check it out - it’s a gamechanger. Use my link for a discount.
Fiore's whole argument is that procrastination isn't a character trait. It's a response to something specific. Maybe you feel powerless in the work. Maybe you've internalized the idea that you should always be working, so your brain rebels. Maybe it's something else entirely. The point is that "I'm a procrastinator" isn't a diagnosis. It's a label that stops the conversation before it starts.
That aligns with how I coach. Whatever's underneath the procrastination is the actual thing to work on, and it's different for every client.
Here's where Shortform earns its spot in my workflow. Their guide on this book pulled in research from a completely different book that made Fiore's point even sharper:
The book gives you Fiore. The guide brings in Hari from a separate book and the idea gets twice as useful. That's why I keep Shortform open while I'm reading.
Try Shortform free + get 25% OFF at https://shortform.com/express
🔥Quote/Prompt
The place you are in needs you today.
Use the quote as a writing or thinking prompt to finish your week strong.
A bit from mine:
(posted in our Doer Entrepreneurs Free Community — off social media)
I love this one because it's a great reminder that you don't have to wait until you're the "future, more polished version" of yourself to show up and do the work.
The place you are in (your business, your client list, your community) needs: […]
Did someone forward this to you?
📈 Performance
You've sat down to do real work, hit the part of the day where everything feels harder than it should, and started having a quiet little argument with yourself about whether to push through or call it. We've all been there. And the way that argument goes, more than your calendar or your to-do list, is what actually decides whether you finish the day proud or fried.
Alexa von Tobel's piece in Fast Company digs into something kind of fascinating. After 300+ podcast interviews with founders, she noticed nearly all of them have a mantra. Not the woo kind. A specific phrase they repeat to themselves on hard days. And it turns out there's actual neuroscience behind why this works...we're talking Ethan Kross's research on distanced self-talk and Martin Seligman's work on optimistic explanatory style.
According to psychologist Ethan Kross, people who engage in intentional self-talk, particularly using second or third person ("You can do this" rather than "I can do this"), demonstrate measurably better emotional regulation and higher persistence under stress.
Key Insights:
The mantra works because of repetition, not because the words are magic. When you return to the same phrase under pressure, you're training a neural shortcut that fires automatically when the moment hits. Whether you're solo or have a small team, that automatic anchor is what carries you through the part of the day where decision fatigue would otherwise tank everything.
Talking to yourself in the second or third person is the actual trick. Kross found that referring to yourself by name or saying "you can do this" creates psychological distance, which lets you process a hard moment the way you'd coach a friend through it. Sounds woo. Research is REAL.
Optimistic explanatory style is trainable, not a personality trait you were either born with or weren't. Seligman's research shows that people who treat setbacks as temporary and specific (rather than permanent and global) are the ones who keep going. Pick a phrase that reframes your worst moments that way, and use it on the worst days. 💪
Read the full article for the specific mantras May Habib (Writer), Mikey Shulman (Suno), and Dr. Becky Kennedy actually use, plus the question von Tobel asks every podcast guest that you can use to land your own.
Note for the extra deep divers: The Kross research on third-person self-talk is real and well-replicated, but a 2022 meta-analysis pegged the effect size as small (Hedges g around -0.26), so "measurably better" is true but the article slightly oversells the magnitude. Same with Seligman's optimistic explanatory style. The link to resilience holds, especially in achievement contexts like sales and athletics, but a few studies in health contexts have shown more complicated outcomes. Practical advice still holds. Pick a phrase, use it on hard days, the consistency is what matters.
⚙️ Optimization
Maybe your blog traffic has been weird this year. Clicks are down, impressions are flat, but somehow your stuff is showing up in ChatGPT and Perplexity answers when people ask about what you do. That isn't a glitch...that's the whole game now, and most freelancers and small business owners are still measuring half of it.
Jon Nastor's piece in Search Engine Land breaks down what actually changed in content strategy this year and what didn't. The framework is written for SEO teams managing 300+ page audits, but the underlying logic translates cleanly down to a smaller operation with a blog, an About page, and a handful of cornerstone posts. The shift you actually need to know about: you're auditing two surfaces now, not one, and they evaluate authority differently.
A piece can lose Google clicks and gain LLM citations in the same quarter. A page that never ranked in Google might be cited regularly by ChatGPT.
Key Insights:
Stop starting with a keyword list. Start with what you can actually defend as your area of authority. The new question is what your business is genuinely credible on...where you have real proof, real depth, and clear authorial expertise. Keywords map to that reality, they don't define it.
ChatGPT and Perplexity don't run on backlinks. They evaluate topical depth, named-author credibility, and how clearly your content resolves a real question. For freelancers and small business owners, this is actually GREAT news. You don't need a link-building team. You need to be visibly, specifically authoritative on a small set of topics, and your About page needs to make that legible to an LLM.
Don't audit your old content by Google traffic alone before cutting it. Some of your weakest-traffic pages may be quietly getting cited in AI search. Pull citation data across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews on your top topics before you delete or rewrite anything, then enhance the pieces earning visibility on the surface that's working.
Read the full article for Nastor's full two-surface audit framework, the specific decision matrix for keep/enhance/cut calls, the four credibility signals LLMs evaluate (named authors, primary data, recency, topical depth), and a real example from the Digital Commerce Partners audit that resolved an entity-relationship gap on the About page.
Note for the extra deep divers: Search Engine Land is owned by Semrush, which is disclosed at the bottom of the article and which Nastor links to a few times throughout. Doesn't undercut the framework but worth knowing the angle. Also: the "13-week recency window" claim about how LLMs weight content is presented as practitioner observation, not a published study. Treat that one as a working rule of thumb rather than settled fact, but the broader two-surface logic is solid.
⏲️ Time Management
Here's the thing about being "busy"...most of us wear it like a badge while quietly burning out underneath it. You sat down this morning to do the one thing that actually moves your business forward. Then a Slack ping, an email, a quick "just looping you in," and forty minutes later you're somehow on the wrong tab researching something that wasn't on today's list. Nothing got done. You're exhausted anyway.
Tracy Brower's piece in Forbes pulls together fresh data from Microsoft's 2025 Work Trend Index, Gallup, McKinsey, and a Cal Newport interview to make a useful argument: busy and productive aren't the same thing, and the gap between them is where burnout lives. The piece is aimed at corporate workers, but the data and the fix translate directly. If anything, freelancers and small business owners feel the chaos more, because there's no one else to absorb the interruptions.
117 is the number of emails the average worker receives each day. 2 minutes is the time between interruptions that the average worker experiences during their core work hours. […] 48% of employees say their work feels chaotic and fragmented.
Key Insights:
Context-switching is more expensive than it feels. Newport says it can take 10 to 20 minutes to fully recover focus after switching tasks, which means a few quick "just real fast" interruptions can eat a whole afternoon. If you're running your own show, every Slack notification, inbox check, and "let me just answer this real quick" is taxing the same finite resource you need for your actual deep work.
Time blocking beats reactive working. Newport's recommendation is to plan your day in 60- to 90-minute focused chunks rather than letting your inbox or to-do list decide what you do next. For freelancers and small business owners, this is the difference between ending the day having moved a real project forward versus ending it having "been productive" in 47 small ways that didn't compound.
Overestimate how long things will take. Newport's rule: if you think a task will take an hour, give yourself two. Chronic underestimation is one of the biggest drivers of feeling behind, and feeling behind all day is a fast track to burnout even when you're objectively getting things done. Padding your blocks isn't laziness, it's accuracy.
Read the full article for Brower's full breakdown of the burnout-versus-busyness distinction, the Headway pressure stats, Newport's full set of strategies including his take on whether AI is actually helping us yet, and the research linking purpose to better health outcomes and stronger business performance.
Note for the extra deep divers: The Microsoft 2025 Work Trend Index numbers are accurate but slightly simplified. The "20% work over the weekend" stat is technically "20% of weekend workers check email before noon on Saturday and Sunday," which is a subset framing. The "29% work email after 10pm" matches Microsoft's "almost one-third are back in their inboxes by 10pm" within rounding. Doesn't change the takeaway. The work day really has gotten more fragmented and the data backs that up across multiple primary sources.
💻 Tools & Technology
Best ideas hit you in the shower, on a walk, or three minutes into a workout. Worst ideas hit you while you're already at your desk. There's a real reason for that, and it's why most to-do apps lose half of what your brain actually generates. By the time you've unlocked your phone, opened the app, picked the right project, and typed out the first thought...the next two are already gone. Frustrating.
Rajesh Pandey's piece in Android Police walks through Todoist's new Ramble feature, which uses an LLM to capture spoken, unstructured thoughts and turn them into properly tagged tasks in real time. It's an Android-focused review, but Ramble works across iOS, desktop, and web. The piece is essentially a hands-on test of whether voice-to-task actually works the way the marketing claims.
It lets you add tasks to Todoist using your voice, and because it's powered by large language models (LLMs), it understands natural speech and turns it into the right action automatically.
Key Insights:
Ramble doesn't just transcribe, it parses. You can say "Remind me to talk to Sarah tomorrow afternoon for the Q2 launch" and it captures the task, the deadline, and the project tag automatically. For freelancers and small business owners juggling multiple clients or projects, that's the difference between a usable inbox and a giant pile of "Sarah call?" notes you have to re-sort later.
You can ramble multiple tasks in one session and edit them mid-stream. Say "actually, make that Thursday" or "that's all" and it adjusts in real time. This matters because the friction of structuring thoughts before you've fully had them is exactly what stops most voice capture from working.
The free Beginner plan caps you at 10 sessions per month, with unlimited sessions on Pro and Business. If you're testing it out, that's plenty to know whether the workflow clicks. If it does, the upgrade math is pretty simple given how many ideas you're losing right now. ✨
Read the full article for Pandey's full breakdown of where Ramble actually fits into a daily workflow, examples of the kinds of voice prompts that work well, the home screen and quick settings shortcuts that make it usable on the go, and his take on multilingual support and edge cases.
Note for the extra deep divers: Pandey says Ramble supports "over 40 languages." Todoist's official documentation says 38 to 40 depending on which page you check. Minor, doesn't affect anything practical, but worth knowing if you write in a less-common language. Also worth noting Ramble runs on Google's Gemini 2.5 Flash Live model via Vertex AI, and Doist says audio isn't stored or used for training. They're SOC 2 Type II certified. If you're using this for client-related task capture, that's the privacy posture to know.
🤖 AI
Most of what eats your day in a browser is the same handful of repeated motions. Pull a number from one tab, paste it into another. Compare three vendor pricing pages. Summarize a candidate's portfolio before a meeting. None of it is the actual work, and all of it adds up to hours.
Sarah Perez's piece in TechCrunch reports on Google's Cloud Next announcement of "auto browse," a Gemini-powered agent built directly into Chrome that handles those exact kinds of tasks. The piece is framed for enterprise IT readers, but the use cases listed are the everyday tab-juggling that anyone running a small operation does on autopilot. Worth flagging up front though...Perez also points out the catch that doesn't usually make the press release, which is that AI tools aren't actually reducing workload in practice. That part deserves attention.
This is the larger promise from AI advocates: that you'll get your time back by using this new technology. But in practice, studies have shown that AI isn't reducing work — it's intensifying it.
Key Insights:
Auto browse is Workspace-only and U.S.-only at launch, so it's not yet on your personal Chrome. But the direction is clear, and the consumer-facing version of these "Skills" workflows already exists. If you've been resisting AI agent tools because they felt awkward to set up, an agent that just lives in your browser and watches your tabs is going to lower the barrier significantly when it rolls out broadly.
Save your repeating workflows as "Skills" if and when you get access. Pull them up with a slash. The whole value of agentic tools is when you stop using them as one-off prompts and start treating them like macros for the parts of your work that genuinely repeat...vendor comparisons, CRM data entry, candidate research, competitor monitoring. Identify yours before you have the tool, so you're ready when you do.
Read the workload research before you assume this saves you time. Recent research found that AI tools tend to expand the scope of what people attempt rather than reduce the work itself. Faster task completion raises expectations for speed, which increases scope, which increases workload. For freelancers and small business owners with no buffer, this matters MORE than for enterprise teams. The AI doesn't manage the expectation creep. You do.
Read the full article for Perez's full breakdown of what auto browse can actually do (CRM data entry, vendor pricing comparisons, candidate portfolio summaries, competitor data extraction), the human-in-the-loop confirmation step Google is requiring, the new "Shadow IT risk detection" feature for IT teams, and the expanded Okta partnership for session security.
Note for the extra deep divers: The "AI intensifies work" claim Perez references is well-supported, specifically by an 8-month UC Berkeley qualitative study by Ranganathan and Ye published in Harvard Business Review in February 2026. They identified three forms of intensification: task expansion, blurred boundaries, and cognitive overload from multitasking. The picture across the broader literature is mixed, with other studies showing real productivity gains in narrow tasks like coding and writing. So both can be true. AI helps with specific tasks, and the cumulative effect on workload over months is more work, not less. The fix the researchers recommend is "AI practice" — intentional pauses, sequenced usage, and human check-ins. For a small operation, the version of this is: define what you're using AI to free up time for before you start using it, or you'll just absorb the time saved into more tasks.
🎉 Celebration Corner
Every week Doers Inner Circle members do a weekly review & get help when they need it — check out the progress they made this week!
Managed to deliver big projects!
Building momentum in WOB tasks, agenda, better overall vision.
What did you do this week? We feature non-member successes too. Just post them here!
🔒Inner Circle: Events & Announcements
We will soon be adding Referral Perks — Refer now to start earning! 👇
As a reminder, you’re getting this twice-weekly newsletter because you opted in to receive awesome productivity and systems tips through one of these methods:
Doer Entrepreneurs, Doers Express Newsletter, Productivity Stacks, Success by Rx, ClickUp Facebook Group, Productive & Successful Translators Facebook Group.
If you’re not interested in improving your and your business’s productivity so you’d like to break up, that’s definitely a bummer. But, you can always use the unsubscribe link at the bottom if you do not want to get these tips — but keep in mind I am hyper-focused on making these twice-weekly emails as valuable as possible.
Got a tip? Hit reply!
I hope you found this valuable!
Wishing you much productivity!
- Jenae :)
Interested in reaching thousands of motivated small business owners, freelancers & founders?
Hit reply and let’s chat about sponsorship. We only include ads that match our mission: to help our readers work smarter and live more.

